Subscribe
IC-VMSI™ Ticker Search

VICA Partners / Institutional Intelligence

Research for capital decisions.

Institutional teams monitor rates, flows, credit, positioning and risk. VICA measures how those conditions fit together—and identifies evidence that supports or challenges a market-state assessment.

VMSI™, IC-VMSI™ and ICMI™ research can be evaluated through institutional briefings, defined research engagements and licensing discussions. No specific investment outcome is promised.

ResearchWeekly market-state assessmentsEngagementPaid services scoped by agreementValidationHistorical audit published; prospective testing ongoing

01 / Institutional Services

Three ways to evaluate or use the research.

Each engagement defines its deliverables, permitted use, timing and fees before work begins. Published research remains available for independent review.

Institutional Briefings

Review the market state.

Scheduled research briefings on VMSI™, IC-VMSI™ and ICMI™: dated scores, changes, conflicting evidence and what would alter the assessment.

Deliverable: Agreed briefing cadence and written research summary.

Scoped Research Evaluation

Test incremental information.

Compare dated VICA assessments against an institution’s existing benchmark using agreed information cutoffs, measures of success and failure, and documented limitations.

Deliverable: Defined test protocol and findings memo, including adverse results.

Research Licensing

Use the research internally.

Discuss licensed access or internal distribution of defined scores, historical observations and research materials, subject to data rights and technical feasibility.

Deliverable: A proposed scope, permitted-use terms and licensing schedule.

Services are proposed for discussion and provided only under mutually agreed terms. Automated data feeds, enterprise integration and unrestricted redistribution are not represented as existing capabilities.

02 / What We Measure

Three scores. Two research lenses.

The scored frameworks serve different measurement purposes. Market Mechanics and Post-Linear Market Theory inform interpretation and testing.

Scored market-state frameworks

Market state

VMSI™

Scores momentum, liquidity, volatility and hedging, and safe-haven demand.

Capital force

IC-VMSI™

Assesses institutional capital force, deployment and persistence from reported and modeled evidence.

Capital migration

ICMI™

Assesses migration using ETF activity, dealer positioning, liquidity, credit and cross-asset relationships.

Interpretation and theory

Market Mechanics

Examines how funding, positioning and execution conditions transmit through markets.

Post-Linear Market Theory

Tests whether capital inertia constrains market outcomes despite variable paths.

Shared or correlated observations do not count as independent confirmations. Inferred positions are not verified trades.

03 / Dated Market-State Example

Implementation improved. Confirmation weakened.

Week ending November 6, 2026

These are fixed historical readings, not current market scores.

51.7

VMSI™ Composite

Cautionary

64.4

IC-VMSI™

Capital-force assessment

48.9

ICMI™

Defensive Capital Migration

Observed: ETF issuance and reserve liquidity improved while equity participation and risk pricing weakened.

Not established: Whether new exposure was retained by institutional investors or supported by durable financing and market absorption.

Source: VICA Institutional Report, week ending November 6, 2026. Read the dated report.

04 / Research Evidence

A measured result. A defined limitation.

Audit 001 tested whether VMSI™ improved forecasts relative to a conventional-signal model.

14.5%

Lower aggregate RMSE in Audit 001

Across 34 historical forecast origins for subsequent 20-trading-day S&P 500 price returns, adding VMSI™ reduced aggregate MAE by 10.5% and RMSE by 14.5%.

What remains unproven

Overlapping forecast windows, negative absolute out-of-sample R² and an overlap-adjusted test that did not reach 5% significance limit the conclusion.

Prospective confirmation and independent replication remain outstanding.

The test does not establish improved investment returns or reliable future forecasts. Review the research record.

05 / Paid Research Evaluation

An evaluation that can fail.

Before work begins, VICA and the institution agree on a use case, test, deliverables, fees, data rights and success and failure criteria.

01

Define the decision

Identify the market-state question and the decision it could affect.

02

Fix the benchmark

Agree on information cutoffs, measures and comparison rules.

03

Document the result

Report supporting and conflicting evidence, including failure to add value.

Scope and capacity are agreed case by case. No return, performance or outcome is guaranteed.

Institutional Inquiries

Evaluate the research in your process.

Include your organization, use case, existing benchmark and intended research use. We will respond to inquiries that match the proposed evaluation scope.